Jesuit perversions of scripture part 2

1 Corinthians 11:24 King James Version (KJV)

24 And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me.

1 Corinthians 11:24 New International Version (NIV)

24 and when he had given thanks, he broke it and said, “This is my body, which is for you; do this in remembrance of me.”

This change is to proof text the catholic doctrine of transubstantiation.

 

John 7:8 King James Version (KJV)

Go ye up unto this feast: I go not up yet unto this feast: for my time is not yet full come.

John 7:8 New International Version (NIV)

You go to the festival. I am not going up to this festival, because my time has not yet fully come.”

This alteration is to proof text the separation of the Jews out of the faith or what is known as antinomianism.

judgment-889219_1280

2 thoughts on “Jesuit perversions of scripture part 2

Add yours

  1. Thank you for pointing these serious issues!
    John 7:8 is a total farce rendering in all cases because it was REQUIRED for all to go to Jerusalem for the Feast of Sukkot (Tabernacles) as a remembrance of the Israelites’ time in the desert when God (Yehovah/Jehovah) provided all for them. For Jesus NOT to go would have been a SIN (1 John 3:4) and he would not have been sinless. This means either the Feast was NOT one of the three required Feasts or a Feast was added (ministry timing addition for the 3 1/2-year ministry doctrine later created). I do not know which is true here. Refer back to John 6:4 where a Passover “a feast of the Jews” was later added for the same reason. (No Jew would have written it that way.)
    This is why it is important to understand the front of the Bible and the culture of the times!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Reblogged this on Truth-Watch and commented:
    Thank you, BB, for pointing these serious issues!
    This is why it is important to understand the FRONT of the Bible and the Hebrews!
    Proof here that John 7:8 is a total farce rendering in all cases because it was REQUIRED for all to go to Jerusalem for the Feast of Sukkot (Tabernacles) as a remembrance of the Israelites’ time in the desert when God (Yehovah/Jehovah) provided all for them. For Jesus NOT to go would have been a SIN (1 John 3:4), corrupting the sinless sacrifice. This means either the Feast was NOT one of the three required Feasts, or text added for a Feast that was not actually occurring, to support the 3 1/2-year ministry doctrine added by the Roman Church hundreds of years later. As stated before, until that new doctrine, the understanding was that Jesus’ ministry lasted “about a year”.
    Refer back to John 6:4 where a Passover “a feast of the Jews” was later added to the text for the same reason. (No Jew would have written it that way and the apostles were Jews.)

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: