Debate in Acts 15

Having heard several sermons on the topic “Us verses Them” concerning Acts 15…. I am no longer in agreement with many of the evangelical ministers of this day. As I study these texts in more detail I am of the opinion that what the “council of Jerusalem” was actually talking about “them WITH us”.

Much in the same light as the insanity surrounding the illegal immigration of America; there is a serious problem with assimilation to the code of conduct and the written laws of the land. This was the exact same for the leaders of the early followers of Yeshua HaMoshiach (Jesus Christ)

Ephesians 3:6 says this very clearly: ” Namely, that the Nations are fellow bnei (sons) HaYerushshah (heirs of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob) of the nachalah (allotted inheritance) and joint evarim (limbs) of HaGuf HaMoshiach (body of Christ) [Isa 53] and joint partakers of the havtachah (promise) in Moshiach Yehoshua (Messiah Jesus) through the Besuras HaGeulah (Announcement of Redemption).

The “council of Jerusalem” settles the matter with these words; “”For Moshe Rabbenu (Moses our Teacher) from ancient dorot (generations) in every shtetl (town) has his maggidim (itinerant preachers) and in the shuls (synagogue) every Shabbos he has been read.”

This told the Apostles, who were active evangelists of the 1st century, that their job was the same as delivered by Jesus, in that, they were to be fishers of men and that the synagogues were there for the teaching and training of the converts. Additionally, that the instructions sent with these evangelists; “But to write to them to keep away from the pollution of elilim (dungy idols) and of zenut (fornication) and of the things strangled and of dahm. (blood)” would be useful for the converts until such time they had made a regular habit of the commandments of God.

This instruction was not a works salvation as many mainline denominations want to label it, it is in fact a post salvation reverence of the majesty of YHVH. This mirrors the act of baptism, as it does not redeem or save a person, it is an outward display of the inward change to ones heart and mind.

Jesus said of Himself, “Do not think that I came to abolish the Torah (Mosaic Law) or the Neviim (words of the Prophets). I did not come to abolish but to complete. Therefore, whoever annuls (makes void) one of the least of these mitzvot (divine commandments given by Hashem to Moshe Rebbenu) and so teaches Bnei Adam (sons of mankind), shall be called katon (least) in the Malchut HaShomayim (Kingdom of Heaven) ; but whoever practices and teaches them, this one will be called gadol (great) in the Malchut HaShomayim.

Notice Jesus says “whoever practices and teaches them, this one will be called gadol (great) in the Kingdom of Heaven.

Before people begin to ____ (laugh, sneer, burn animals) let me clarify one thing. I do believe wholly in the Sacrifice having been made complete in Jesus Christ. This is how He explains His yoke (discipline) as being easy. We are no longer encumbered by the weight and burden of keeping the sacrificial system, which was insanely complicated and dependent upon herds of animals.

Jesus says its good….then its good.


4 thoughts on “Debate in Acts 15

Add yours

  1. I am sorry you have had such bad experiences in church. I have never been in a church that taught a Works salvation. I have no conflict with your post or any Evangelical Church I have been associated with


    1. It isnt so much that I personally am being attacked as it is a mindset in the Evangelical church to divorce themselves from the Hebrew people (they call them Jews) when it is Evangelicals that are claiming to follow the Hebrew God. Why are we not more conscience of this blatantly obvious fact? Because the pulpits are full of Greco-Roman theologists. Rome wanted to build for itself a religious kingdom and did just that. Luthers Reformation only created a Roman Jr. church.


  2. One important notation I have learned (read the chapter carefully): the ‘circumcision faction’ were ALSO believers. The debate was SOLELY on two points: whether circumcision should occur immediately or during the learning process of Torah in the synagogues each Sabbath. This is where the apostles went to teach. To saddle the new Believers with all of the instructions all at once was a burden the Israelites couldn’t even bear in the desert. Do not forget that most of the ‘gentiles’ at that point were northern kingdom Israelites who were part Israelite and partly of pagan heritage, like Timothy. This is why Paul’s writings often refer to strictly Israelite history, knowledge and understanding in many of his letters. Pagans would not have cared about it – only Israelites. Theologian, Alfred Edersheim speaks to this very point in his books because the northern kingdom were called ‘goyim’ by the Judean religious leadership who, having been divorced by Yehovah, they believed never could return. Yeshua stated they were wrong and they didn’t believe him which made Yeshua, in their eyes, apostate. Churchianity teaches this passage completely wrong because there was a dividing point around the end of the first century between the Nazarenes and the Christians who became Nicolaitinism/Catholicism, combining pagan traditions and festivals with belief in Messiah’s work, not understanding the two kingdoms in Yehovah’s plan and remaining true to what they saw as the ‘Jewish Law’ and not Yehovah’s instructions. They didn’t want to be Israelites because they’d always looked down their noses at the Jews. This is what we teach about today!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Website Powered by

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: